Tampilkan postingan dengan label pediatric. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label pediatric. Tampilkan semua postingan

Whats with pre med students shadowing a doctor

| 0 komentar |
Many medical schools are either requiring or highly recommending that applicants show evidence of “shadowing” [following a doctor around] for varying periods of time. This supposedly gives a pre-med student an idea of what doctors do. I guess the schools assume that if someone has shadowed a doctor and still wants to become one, that individual is a better candidate for medical school than someone who hasnt done any shadowing.

A recent incident at a hospital in Syracuse, New York raised some serious concerns about shadowing. An anesthesiologist allowed a college student to endotracheally intubate a patient in the operating room. This was a problem on many levels. Students who are shadowing are not supposed to touch or examine patients. The patient who was intubated likely did not know that an unlicensed college student would be doing a procedure on him. And of course, theres HIPAA.

According to the article, the director of Consumers Unions Safe Patient Project, called the incident an "egregious violation of patient-doctor trust."

Ive had a problem with shadowing for many years, and Im not the first to say so. Dr. Elizabeth Kitsis, director of bioethics education at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, has blogged about the topic.

She told of a male pre-med student who was introduced to patients as a "student doctor" and watched a gynecologist perform pelvic exams. The student himself said he felt a little awkward. One wonders how the unsuspecting patients would have felt had it been known he was a college student thinking about becoming a doctor.

There were many comments pro and con on both Dr. Kitsiss blog and a follow-up piece that appeared on another Einstein blog.

Dr. Kitsis co-authored a paper which found that few studies have looked at shadowing by pre-med students. She called for guidelines and a code of conduct for this activity.

Several questions come to mind.

With all the information available on the Internet, is shadowing really an effective way for college students to decide whether to become physicians or not?

Is there any research comparing career outcomes of pre-med students who shadowed doctors to those who did not?

What about the patients? Do they have any say in this? Are students who shadow introduced as who they really are?

How does a student choose a doctor to shadow? As far as I can tell, there is no quality control for this aspect of shadowing.

Is shadowing mandatory in other fields? Must one shadow before becoming an engineer [civil, railroad, or sanitation], an accountant, a fighter pilot, a shepherd, or an exotic dancer?

Read More..

Effects of acupuncture on pain and inflammation in pediatric appendicitis

| 0 komentar |
A paper [full text here] from The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine says that "acupuncture may be a feasible and effective treatment modality for decreasing subjective pain and inflammation" in pediatric patients with appendicitis.

They studied six adolescents with appendicitis and administered acupuncture for pain control prior to surgery. Pain was assessed using three analog scales, and inflammation was measured using serial white blood cell (WBC) counts and C-reactive protein levels (CRP). CRP is a nonspecific indicator of inflammation in the body.

Figure 2 from the paper summarizes the results.


You can see that after 20 minutes of acupuncture, all three pain scores and WBCs declined. However, CRP continued to rise. Conspicuously absent from the figure and the text of the paper are any statistical analyses. This is due to the lack of a significant difference in any of these values because of the limited number of subjects studied.

The authors were undeterred and concluded "Although CRP as a general marker of inflammation stayed roughly the same on sequential blood draws, the median WBC showed a modest and noticeable drop. The implication of this finding is that the effectiveness of acupuncture may have a biophysiological basis." Look at the figure and decide for yourself if the WBC drop is really more noticeable than the CRP rise.

While the authors did mention some limitations of the study including the lack of statistics, they didnt discuss impediments to using acupuncture in patients who present to an emergency department. Whether patients were given antibiotics before or during the acupuncture session was not stated.

Even if the technique actually works [which is certainly not proven by this paper], how practical would it be to have an acupuncturist on call? Would she take in-house call? If not, how long would it take for her to get to the hospital? Would insurance pay for acupuncture? Would the acupuncturist be subject to work hours limitations?

The authors are not proposing acupuncture as a definitive treatment for appendicitis. So what is the clinical value of reducing inflammation? An even better way to reduce inflammation [and pain] is to remove the diseased appendix.

I know how difficult it is to publish papers and continue to do all the clinical and administrative work of an academic physician. As I have said on several occasions, many of my published papers were simply not very good.

But acupuncture to decrease inflammation in appendicitis patients? I doubt youll be seeing an on-call acupuncturist any time soon.

Read More..