Tampilkan postingan dengan label docs. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label docs. Tampilkan semua postingan

“Code Black” should be pronounced dead

| 0 komentar |
A new television series called “Code Black” debuted last night on CBS. The show’s name supposedly means the emergency department has too many patients and not enough staff. In my over 40 years in medicine, I’ve seen many busy, understaffed EDs but never heard anyone call it a "Code Black."

There is the usual array of standard medical characters—the inexperienced new residents on their first day at work, the savvy nurses, and the cocky, overconfident attendings. This one has a few twists. The world-weary head nurse is a Hispanic man, and the headstrong know-it-all attending is a woman, Dr. Leanne Rorish. She has early conflict with the handsome, more cautious Dr. Neal Hudson, but I see romance in the future should this show manage to stay on the air.

It takes 5 people to push an empty gurney at Angels Memorial
The show started off with a gunshot wound to the neck that the docs had to retrieve from a car which had been abandoned in the hospital parking lot. Although no one had been putting pressure on the damaged carotid artery for an undetermined period of time and blood was visibly spurting out of the wound, the patient pulled through the resuscitation thanks to Dr. Rorish who replaced all his blood with cold IV fluid. She spiced up the resuscitation by asking the new residents questions about what she was doing.

A man with head trauma and a Glascow Coma Score of 3 was brought in and declared brain-dead on the spot. The transplant team was on its way in. Apparently Angels Memorial Hospital has no brain death protocol.

Another man came in with expressive aphasia due to a stroke, received tPA, and promptly woke up and told his wife he loved her. That’s not the way it works.

My favorite vignette was the arrival of a young boy who was short of breath. Learning that he was Norwegian, Dr. Rorish immediately diagnosed a pneumothorax and assigned an unsupervised new resident to insert a chest tube. He of course was a bit nervous. It was touch and go for a while, but he eventually got the job done. The patient was remarkably calm despite not receiving any local anesthesia which, by the way doesn’t work too well for chest tube insertions anyway.

In the midst of all the chaos, Dr. Rorish fired one of the new residents, a woman who disobeyed her by ordering a urine toxicology screen on a patient who was discharged and later determined to be suffering from carbon monoxide poisoning.

I won’t bore you with the details but the fired resident somehow ended up going in an ambulance to get the patient at her home. On the way back to the hospital, they got stuck in traffic. Drs. Rorish and Hudson talked the resident through a cesarean section which she performed in the ambulance without any assistance.

Did I mention that Dr. Rorish was doing a burr hole on a patient with an epidural hematoma while all this was going on? This scenario was plausible since it can often be difficult to get a neurosurgeon to come to the hospital.

At this point, Id had enough.

Here’s an idea that I’d like to pitch to the networks. It’s a show about the fast-paced world of nursing homes, and it’s called “Code Brown.” For those of you who don’t know, a Code Brown is called whenever a patient poops so much that it takes four people to clean up.

ADDENDUM: I had heard about more crazy stuff in the second episode of Code Black. Against my better judgment, I watched it. To read my review of that one, click here.
Read More..

What about a rural track surgical residency program

| 0 komentar |
Heres an email from someone interested in rural surgery:

I am a senior medical student planning on going in to general surgery and practicing in a moderate sized city (~70k people), but would also like to do some medical missions. I currently do not plan on doing a fellowship after residency, and would like to go directly into practice. I have seen a growing trend of "rural programs” popping up including Mayo starting a rural track this year, Wisconsin has one rural spot, and Gundersen is another notable program. For many of these programs you leave your primary training hospital during PGY3-4 and go train rural hospital, you may also spend more time doing OB/GYN cases or other surgical specialties. How do you think this affects the preparedness of the residents leaving these programs vs a community program with a high case load or university program? Most of these programs advertise all the “extra” skills acquired from participating in their rural tracks but don’t discuss what that means you will miss.

Great question. I have no personal experience with rural track surgical programs. From what I have read, most residents who go this route emerge satisfied.

I think you need to speak to a few residents who have done it and see if they feel they missed anything. It probably wouldnt be too hard to get some names from coordinators in programs that have the rural option.

My concern for your situation is that if you plan to practice in a city of about 70,000, it is highly unlikely that you will be doing C-sections, orthopedics, or G.I. endoscopy. This would negate much of the value of doing a rural track. I have a few former residents who practice in small towns and do C-sections and endoscopies, but those locations have fewer than 10,000 people. My program provided a decent endoscopy experience, but since we had an OB/GYN residency, I think my graduates learned to do C-sections after they left the program.

Since you are planning to practice in a community hospital, you may want to consider training in a busy community hospital residency program. The way things are going in general surgery, case volume is becoming more and more important. As a general surgeon in a city of 70,000, you will probably not be doing big cases such as Whipples and major vascular surgery anyway.

Can any of my readers offer you more advice?
Read More..