Tampilkan postingan dengan label can’t. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label can’t. Tampilkan semua postingan

What comes after the Heimlich maneuver

| 0 komentar |
At the end of an otherwise informative article about the nuances of performing a Heimlich maneuver, New York Times science reporter Jane E. Brody recommends that if all else fails, a cricothyrotomy should be attempted.

She goes on to briefly explain how the procedure is done. In the right hands, a cricothyrotomy is safer and easier to perform than a formal tracheostomy. However, for a layperson who has never seen either procedure done, does not know the relevant anatomy, and has never put a knife to anyones skin, it is highly unlikely to be successful.

Ms. Brody includes a link to website with some static drawings of the procedure. The site is called Aarons Tracheostomy Page and it bills itself as "The Internets leading tracheostomy resource since 1996."

Heres an excerpt from that description of the operation:

"3. Take the razor blade or knife and make a half-inch horizontal incision. The cut should be about half an inch deep. There should not be too much blood." Yes, there should not be too much blood, but sometimes there is.

Both the Times article and the reference repeat the medical urban legend that the barrel of a ballpoint pen can be used as a breathing tube.

A 2010 paper found that due to high resistance to airflow, most ballpoint pens are not adequate airways, and the two that were acceptable (the Baron retractable ballpoint and the BIC Soft Feel Jumbo) are unlikely to be on hand. An earlier paper also reported similar high airflow resistance with ballpoint pens.

A small study involving inexperienced junior doctors and medical students found that they were able to successfully perform cricothyrotomies in only 8 of 14 cadavers. Injuries to the thyroid and cricoid cartilages were common.

Remember these important points—cadavers dont need an airway in a hurry and they dont bleed.

Evidence of successful cricothyrotomy by bystanders is lacking. A 2010 review of American soldiers killed in Iraq between 2003 and 2006 noted that five of those who died appeared to have had attempts at cricothyrotomy, all of which failed.

I once was asked to see a patient whose "cricothyrotomy" done in an ED by an experienced emergency physician and a resident turned out to be a laryngotomy. The tube was inserted directly into the larynx.

To the uninitiated, surgery looks easy. Last year I blogged about Malcolm Gladwells outrageous claim that just about any college graduate could become a cardiac surgeon.

I suppose one might say "What have you got to lose? The patient is dying. Try the cricothyrotomy." I can’t stop you. But be certain it is necessary, and realize your chances of success are extremely low.

If you’re considering it, at least look at some of the many instructional videos available online.

Warning: Graphic. There is some blood. Here’s one by an ED doc. In a non-hospital setting, you would not have all the help and equipment he had. Here’s another, this time by a surgeon—with lots of help and equipment. Both patients were relatively thin.

Now imagine doing it with a pocket knife and a ballpoint pen on an obese person. Still think it’s easy?
Read More..

Some venous thromboembolic events can’t be prevented even with optimal care

| 0 komentar |
I have written several posts about how I get things right before others see the light, but none better than one from three years ago pointing out that some of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) "never events" cant really be completely prevented and therefore should not be considered "never events."

One specific "never event" I questioned was hospital acquired venous thromboembolic (VTE) disease which encompasses deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE). I wrote "I am unaware of any DVT study in which no patients in the experimental arm developed DVTs or PEs. Patients will develop DVT or PE even with the best evidence-based care."

Along comes a brief research letter published last month in JAMA Surgery by a group from Johns Hopkins led by surgeon Elliott R. Haut.

Of 92 patients in their institution who had VTEs in a single year, 43 (47%) had received defect-free care. That is, each of those patients received all doses of risk-appropriate pharmacological prophylaxis ordered for the entire hospitalization.

To put it another way, VTEs for those 43 patients were not preventable. There would be no way to do a quality improvement project for a group of patients who received the right prophylaxis throughout their hospital stays and still got VTEs.

The Joint Commission/CMS criterion states that a hospital is in compliance with VTE prophylaxis if a patient receives one dose of an appropriate drug within 24 hours of admission. The Hopkins study showed that of the 49 patients (53%) whose care was suboptimal, 36 (73%) missed at least one dose of prophylaxis that was correctly ordered. Other studies have shown that missing even one dose of prophylaxis at any time during a hospitalization increases the risk of VTE.

So about half of VTEs are not preventable even with perfect adherence to the prophylaxis protocol, and the standard for compliance established by the JC/CMS is inadequate to judge the quality of an institutions performance for VTE prevention.

The study shows that 1) a lot of good information can be delivered in a two-page paper, 2) JC/CMS criteria for compliance with VTE prophylaxis need to be revisited, and 3) VTE should be removed from the list of "never events.”
Read More..

A One Page Sales Letter by Marc Charles

| 0 komentar |
Hi Gang:

Ive written more than 1000 sales letters and landing pages over the past 12 years.

This month Ill post some of them.

Some of these did really well and some of them were dismal.

But Im not going to tell you which is which.

Sorry.

Youll have to figure it out.

Marc Charles



How to Become Black Ops 2 EXPERT in Three Hours or Less

The New “Underground” Strategy and Cheat Sheet Guide Revealed

Dear Friend: 

You can Google BlackOps strategies for months and you’ll NEVER find the information packed into our new guide.

Seriously – this is it!

Ultimate Black Ops 2 Revealed Strategy Guide 

Our 60-page+ guide will lift you to EXPERT status in just a few hours. We reveal little-known gems and packets. 

You also receive:
·       #1 Rated Black Ops 2 Strategy Guide
·       136 NEW cheats, tips, strategies
·       Exclusive Cheat Codes
·       Dozens of Easter eggs and hidden gems
·       Professional Tips
·       Advanced Strategies
·       NEW Unlock Codes
·       Regular FREE Updates
·       Step-by-Step Instructions
·       World-class Support!

Listen to our customers:



“I’ve used many of the hint cheat guides over the years, but I just had to tell you that I think yours is really the best. Many of the guides didn’t do a very good job of guiding me through step by step. This is what really made the game exciting for me. I love it! I hope you keep publishing this guide for all the new Black Ops games as well!”
                                                                    Charlie Kalmen, Rhode Island

“Your Black Ops 2 strategy guide is killer. I tried using the regular game manual and it helped a little, but your guide showed me how to actually play it, thanks to the exclusive tips. Thanks for the killer guide.”
                                                                       Branden Willis, New York

“I just have to tell you that I really love your Black Ops 2 strategy guide. For me the best part is the cheat codes and exclusive hints and tips. Those really open the door for me to play the game.”

                                                                        Kayla Williams, Florida

If you want jump to Black Ops 2 EXPERT LEVEL, our e-book is a perfect fit!


Buy It Now
100% Money Back Guarantee

You’ll receive:

·       Black Ops 2 60+ Page Strategy Guide
·       New Cheat Codes
·       Exclusive Tips
·       Award Winning Support
·       Free Updates and News

“Thanks for the cheat codes! I’ve never used them before but now I see that I have really been missing out on the older Black Ops games. I showed the guide to a friend of mine and he was amazed because he has other hint guides and he said that yours has stuff in it that he hasn’t seen anywhere else. Keep up the good work!”
                                                                          Brian Klot, Texas


Download BlackOps 2 REVEALED Here!



Read More..

Those who can publish Those who can’t blog

| 0 komentar |
What’s your view on social media and science? For example, the role of science blogs in critiquing published papers? "Those who can, publish. Those who can’t, blog," says Jingmai OConnor.

According to Cell.com, Dr. O’Connor is a professor at the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and her comment was part of an interview published last month.

Dr. OConnor says, "It often seems those who criticize or spend large amounts of time blogging are also those who don’t generate much [sic] publications themselves." She thinks comments should be peer-reviewed and published only in journals. She worries about the public who may not realize "a published paper passed rigorous review by experts, which carries more validity than the opinion of some disgruntled scientist or amateur on the internet." She adds, "criticism in social media is damaging to science, as it is to most aspects of our culture."

Apparently she isnt aware that peer review is under fire from a number of respectable sources.

"If peer review was a drug it would never be allowed onto the market," said Drummond Rennie, a contributing deputy editor of JAMA. Richard Smith, former editor of the BMJ agrees "because we have no convincing evidence of its benefits but a lot of evidence of its flaws."

In 2015, 107 scientific papers were retracted by several journals because their authors, nearly all of whom were Chinese academics, had performed fraudulent peer review by creating fictitious names and email addresses of suggested reviewers so they could write glowing reviews of their own work. Some of these charlatans are from Beijing, where Dr. OConnor is based.

Australian bloggers found an error that had somehow been missed during "rigorous review by experts" regarding the number needed to treat in a New England Journal of Medicine paper on targeted vs. universal decolonization to prevent ICU infection. They contacted the papers corresponding author who acknowledged the mistake within 11 days. It took five months for a correction to appear online in the journal.

Whether Dr. OConnor likes it or not, the future will involve more immediate feedback about research papers. For example, PubMed and PubPeer already allow comments, and the BMJ also has a section for online rapid responses.

Blogger Marc Bellemare, an associate professor of economics at the University of Minnesota, cites David McKenzie, an economist/blogger at the World Bank who thinks that blogs play an important role in disseminating information to the public and "raise the profile of bloggers and their institution."

But Bellemare feels blogging might not be for every academic He quotes Tyler Cowen of George Mason University, who when asked why dont more economists blog replied, "I believe it is because they can’t, at least not without embarrassing themselves rather quickly, even if they are smart and very good economists. It’s simply a different set of skills."

Maybe Dr. OConnor doesnt have the skill set to blog. I say, "Those who can, blog. Those who cant, insult those who can."
Read More..